Either you know or you've gotta believe
نویسندگان
چکیده
The standard analysis of knowledge in contemporary epistemology is the view that a subject \(S\) knows proposition \(p\) iff 1.) true; 2.) believes \(p\); 3.) justified believing \(p\). Hence, true belief (JTB)1. second condition (propositional) entails called entailment thesis and has been considered by majority as uncontroversial. Numerous accounts have constructed involving granting it default status. generally accepted today's something more than 'merely' belief. Few philosophers argued against thesis, even if barely any arguments for presented. Some earlier voices arguing superiority were Colin Radford's Bernard Williams'. Today Blake Myers-Schulz Eric Schwitzgebel well Dylan Murray, Justin Sytsma Jonathan Livengood provide convincing disputing rightfulness thesis. In what follows I will discuss different point out overlooked connection between these argue supports yet another line argument further are two separate concepts, neither which can be defined terms other, complex requires conditions knowledge, most all agent's actions.
منابع مشابه
You gotta believe
I argue that proper assertion requires belief. Jennifer Lackey has recently argued otherwise. Here I respond to Lackey’s argument and provide positive evidence that permissible assertion does require belief. The positive evidence takes the form of an explanatory argument from linguistic patterns surrounding the give and take of assertion. Looming large in the background of the discussion is whe...
متن کاملYou gotta know when to hold 'em...
Putting together a winning team is certainly not a game. It requires skill, diligence, and a little bit of luck. The poker analogy is simply a tool to present critical information in a fun, relevant format. However, with a proactive, pragmatic, and creative approach to hiring, you will improve your odds of successfully hiring the perfect match for your practice. Good luck!
متن کاملThe “either You Know Which Is Better or You Don’t” Strategy
N apparent ethical dilemma arises when physicians consider enrolling their patients in randomized clinical trials. Suppose that a randomized clinical trial comparing two treatments is in progress, and a physician has an opinion about which treatment is better. The physician has a duty to promote the patient’s best medical interests and therefore seems to be obliged to advise the patient to rece...
متن کاملKnowing What to Believe (when you already know something)
Although much work in NLP has focused on simply determining what a document means, we also must know whether or not to believe it. Fact-finding algorithms attempt to identify the “truth” among competing claims in a corpus, but fail to take advantage of the user’s prior knowledge and presume that truth itself is universal and objective rather than subjective. We introduce a framework for incorpo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Qeios
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2632-3834']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32388/imuazj